Top News
'Dancing With the Stars' recap: The pain begins as first star is dramatically sent home  ||   Paramilitary forces gearing up to fight winters, skin diseases in Kashmir valley  ||   How 'Game of Thrones' taught us the tragedy of war  ||   From Greta Thunberg to universal health care: Is the UN moving on from Donald Trump?  ||   Army plans to open Siachen Glacier for Indian citizens  ||   Mohan Bhagwat interacts with foreign media  ||   NFL power rankings: Danny Dimes leads a Giant surge in Week 3  ||   'Dancing With the Stars' recap: The pain begins as first star is dramatically sent home  ||   Licensed private security agencies to soon be listed for public viewing: Amit Shah  ||   Indonesian forest fires putting 10 million children at risk: UN  ||   My print-only local newspaper won't chase Twitter likes, Google searches — just the story  ||   SC says Centre should frame guidelines to deal with social media misuse  ||   Donald Trump slammed for trolling Greta Thunberg climate speech  ||   Rajeev Kumar claims CBI 'hounding' him, seeks pre-arrest bail  ||   Time for Nancy Pelosi to stand up and lead on Donald Trump's impeachment  ||   Trump says Rouhani meeting not scheduled as speculation swirls  ||   Trump at the UN, Tropical Storm Karen, Chanel Miller's memoir: 5 things you need to know Tuesday  ||   Afghans fear violence, fraud as presidential vote looms  ||   China planning controls on e-cigarettes amid health concern  ||   Indian diplomat refuses to comment on Trump's mediation offer on J&K, says 'wait' for bilateral meet  ||            

What's the best approach to boost your 401(k)? Active, passive or a little of both?  2 Months ago

Source:   USA Today  


The late, great Jack Bogle of Vanguard once called passive investment “the greatest invention in the history of finance.”

His legendary career thrived upon this premise. Now, conventional wisdom commonly believes passive management beats active – and fund managers aren’t worth their fees. Yet a recent study of active manager performance by consulting firm Wilshire Associates debunks parts of this belief. Many active managers actually did very well this last decade.  

I’m not arguing here for active or passive. But how and why some active managers achieved their success offers you actionable tips to deploy in your 401(k) or other retirement portfolios.

Passive’s prophets primarily presume active equals stock-picking. They rightly argue markets are too efficient for anyone to repeatedly pinpoint needles in our stock market haystack. Yet, whether an active manager outperforms is less about getting stock picks right than about identifying – and capitalizing on – a benchmark’s quirks (like those of the Standard & Poor's 500 or any index).

Take the 1990s, as Japan’s stock market bubble burst. Any globally diversified investor (which you should be) could beat that decade just underweighting Japanese stocks. Japan started 1990 totaling half the money value of the world’s stock market. Crazy! You needed nothing else to beat the world than underweighting Japan. Speculating on dot-com IPOs? Unnecessary.  Just that one big-picture decision was enough.  

View Wilshire’s study in this light, and its findings aren’t surprising. For instance, 79% of small-cap growth managers beat their indexes over the past five years. Skill? No. This, too, is wonkiness. The biggest stock in MSCI’s US Small Cap Growth Index has a market capitalization of $10.2 billion. Many small-cap managers own much bigger, but still relatively small stocks. Why? It’s less strategy and more necessity.

Most fund firms struggle to trade tiny stocks without moving the price significantly. So they end up owning many stocks bigger than their benchmarks. When larger stocks beat smaller ones –  as they have lately – active small-cap managers outperform. It would be weird if most of them hadn’t beaten their benchmarks with the wind to larger stocks’ backs.

This also explains why their relative returns were worse going further back – small stocks beat big ones early in this bull market, as they usually do early on. Managers’ skewing to slightly larger stocks hurt them then as this bull market launched. A few lousy years early!  A few great ones later! Cycles happen.

Going passive is cheap, smart and often truly better as Bogle always said. But Wilshire’s report shows the benefits of hedging passiveness based on style and size. Be passive with one chunk and active in another to avoid index craziness.

The trick? Understanding index quirks. Most major index providers like MSCI, S&P or Russell offer online fact sheets detailing their indexes’ construction.  These tools help you spot crazy wonkiness to hedge against.

Expecting U.S. stocks to hugely lead or lag foreign ones? Then adjust your U.S. holdings above or below America’s 63% global weight. Or maybe lower them down to 55% or up to 70%. Many readers probably think underweighting America now is stupid, given we’ve beaten foreign stocks lately.  

But that is almost 100% due to America’s huge tech dominance. Strip it out – then U.S. and foreign returns nearly match. Expect that to persist? Emphasize tech among American holdings while overweighting non-tech overseas.

You can do all this and more with individual stocks or exchange-traded funds (ETFs) from iShares or State Street’s SPDR.  Actively avoiding crazy extremes isn’t crazy.  Be passive and active – just be proactive, not reactive.

More News
About Us Terms & Conditions Disclaimer
Advertise Contact
register and win

NRIS.COM is one of the premier NRI website that provides a range of resourceful services to Indian expats residing in the USA. Visiting the site you will find comprehensive information related to restaurants, casinos, pubs, temples, carpool, movies, education, real estate, and forums. The simple and easy to navigate format allows NRIs to gain information within a fraction of a second. Moreover, advertising through its column of Indian free classifieds in USA allow businesses to improve visibility of their brand.

NY NRI's Chat (0 Users Online)